Saturday, September 13, 2014

Marriage

In my opinion, marriage is very much still alive in America but it has changed and morphed into something different. In the past it was used for "the wrong reasons" because it was often more of a financial decision. That still exists today, but what we perceive as "love" does make a lot of these marriages happen. What keeps marriages alive in America is all of the benefits that it gives the couple, if it didn't give any do you seriously think the same amount of people would still marry? I somehow doubt it, but hey I could be wrong. It’s because of these benefits that marriage will always be part of the social fabric, it doesn't only benefit the couple but also its family. If you think about it, if it only benefits the couple and its family the government wouldn't support it as much, so if you would take a wild guess whether it benefits the government or not; you should guess yes and you'll be right. Should it be this way? Should marriage only be a display of love and commitment and nothing else? That sounds great but sounds a bit funny when I read it, that wouldn't work. Marriage should be a part of the social fabric, not only because for most people it is in fact a symbol of love and commitment, but because it just generally helps.


Rivera’s essay talks about temporary marriages, and whether they would reduce divorce rates or not and she says things I completely agree with. Some things would be, " Allowing couples to choose how long they should be married defeats the purpose of getting married at all." and "'temporary marriage' should not have been considered as a marriage in the first place." Although I agree with what she said I still think temporary marriages would reduce divorce rates. It doesn't matter what it should or shouldn't be called, or whether it defeats the purpose or not. I'm sure people would much rather wait for their marriage to expire than to go through all of the paperwork that comes with divorce. If they don't like each other, all they have to do is avoid each other and never renew their marriage: resulting in divorce rates dropping. I think creating temporary marriages would a good idea, I’m sure for some it would insulting to their religion even degrading and that’s fine. All they would do is ignore it and stick with their normal marriage. To those who aren't religious or just don't care, it would be helpful for them to at least have the option of a temporary marriage. This is only my opinion, I could be on target or way off the mark, but either way; I truly believe temporary marriages can drop divorce rates dramatically.

15 comments:

  1. I think it could drop divorce rates,but it defeats the purpose of marriage. I think gay couples should be allowed to be married before temporary licenses are created, but that's just my opinion. You show a good view that many don't even consider though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe that the benefits gained from a marriage are more-or-less a result of the commitment made due to the love between two people. I do agree though that these benefits are a real factor in the decision to get married; however, I have a feeling that love is the primary reason for most thoroughly thought marriages. As for temporary marriages though, I do agree with you to a certain degree, and this is mainly because temporary marriages would give couples a second chance to rethink their commitment and decide whether or not to continue or make it a permanent decision.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The temporary marriage could reduce the divorce rates. Many religious people would be against it and wouldn't want it to exist.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think a temporary marriage is bad idea because if you really love somebody and you were ready for marriage you would give you heart to them for life not for a couple of years. A marriage is supposed to be a lifetime.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would rather have my marriage expire than go through a divorce. I also think marriages are still doing strong.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I felt like you really interested the reader, personally i enjoyed this blog very much, it kept me entertained and i agreed with many things.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think temporary marriages are like divorces. You might not sign a divorce paper but you get separated if things don't work out in 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree that marriage is totally different now. I agree that marriage is generally a good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In my opinion, I think temporary marriage is somewhat dumb. Marriage is a sign of two people who love each other and want to spend the rest of their lives together.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I would have to disagree with your statement of lowing divorce rates by issuing temporary marriages. It actually could potentially raise them, if the temporary couple decides they can't wait the to years, who's to say they wont divorce. Therefore, defeating its entire purpose. Even though its a shorter term, divorce will always be an option.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think if a couple wanted to get married, they should want to stick by each other for life. Temporary marriages may reduce the divorce rate, but it kind of voids the purpose of getting married.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sad to even think that people still marry for financial issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many people get married for finacial issues. How do you want to live? Its many combination of things or situations.

      Delete
  13. I agree with you, marriage is alive but it also has changed. I agree with you "temporary marriage" defeats the purpose of marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree that marriage is still alive because some people do take marriage seriously. It does make sense to how you said it will allow people who are not religious to have a chance at marriage, but I still don't think it will help drop divorce rates by a lot.

    ReplyDelete